Done. Your FY2025 reforecasts improved steadily with each version, and the 9+3 was nearly perfect. Here's what the data shows:

**The headline:** Your 9+3 reforecast nailed it—just $3K off on $11.2M revenue (0.02%), with a 0.63% MAPE. That's almost all from having nine actual months in the books; the remaining three-month forecast was tight.

**The pattern:** Each reforecast knocked down error as more actuals replaced forecasts (Budget → 3.2% miss → 3+9 → 1.6% miss → 6+6 → 1.4% miss → 9+3 → 0.02%). This is normal—but the real story is that July was wrong in *every* version (ranging from $80K to $132K off), even after actuals came in. That suggests either an event nobody saw coming or a structural misunderstanding that lingered through mid-year.

**Operating expenses were easier.** All four versions came within 0.55% of actual ($2.5M). Budget nailed it nearly flat (off $649), and the later versions stayed close. One May spike in professional fees ($32K over budget) was the main miss in the year.

Both outputs are in `output/` for your review.